Certified Fraud Examiner Practice Exam 2026 – All-in-One Guide to Master Your Certification!

In Brady v. Maryland (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution has an obligation to disclose evidence that is favorable to the defendant, which may include evidence that could exonerate them or mitigate their sentence. This ruling is rooted in the principle of due process, emphasizing the fairness of the judicial process. The Court established that withholding such evidence infringes upon the defendant's right to a fair trial, thereby potentially affecting the outcome of the case.

The requirement for the prosecution to turn over exculpatory evidence is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the justice system, as it ensures that both parties have access to all pertinent information that could influence a jury's decision. The significance of this ruling has shaped how evidence is handled in criminal cases, emphasizing the ethical responsibility of prosecuting attorneys to present all relevant information, not just that which supports their case.